Ebook: Weed Science - A Plea for Thought - Revisited
Author: Robert L. Zimdahl (auth.)
- Tags: Agriculture
- Series: SpringerBriefs in Agriculture
- Year: 2012
- Publisher: Springer Netherlands
- Edition: 1
- Language: English
- pdf
Weed scientists are confident of increasing production through agricultural technology, including herbicides, but do not must ask if the moral obligation to feed people is sufficient justification for the benefits and harms achieved. A continuing, rigorous examination of the science’s goals that leads to appropriate change is advocated. Weed scientists have a research consensus - a paradigm - Weeds must be controlled. Herbicides are the best control technology. Agriculture's practitoners should discuss the necessity and risks of their technology. Discussion must include scientific evidence and value-laden arguments.
Weed scientists are confident of increasing production through agricultural technology, including herbicides, but do not must ask if the moral obligation to feed people is sufficient justification for the benefits and harms achieved. A continuing, rigorous examination of the science’s goals that leads to appropriate change is advocated. Weed scientists have a research consensus - a paradigm - Weeds must be controlled. Herbicides are the best control technology. Agriculture's practitoners should discuss the necessity and risks of their technology. Discussion must include scientific evidence and value-laden arguments.
Weed scientists are confident of increasing production through agricultural technology, including herbicides, but do not must ask if the moral obligation to feed people is sufficient justification for the benefits and harms achieved. A continuing, rigorous examination of the science’s goals that leads to appropriate change is advocated. Weed scientists have a research consensus - a paradigm - Weeds must be controlled. Herbicides are the best control technology. Agriculture's practitoners should discuss the necessity and risks of their technology. Discussion must include scientific evidence and value-laden arguments.
Content:
Front Matter....Pages i-xii
The Need for Historical Perspective....Pages 1-23
Pesticides and Value Questions....Pages 25-30
The Pesticide Paradigm....Pages 31-41
A Question of Faith....Pages 43-63
The Future....Pages 65-70
Back Matter....Pages 71-73
Weed scientists are confident of increasing production through agricultural technology, including herbicides, but do not must ask if the moral obligation to feed people is sufficient justification for the benefits and harms achieved. A continuing, rigorous examination of the science’s goals that leads to appropriate change is advocated. Weed scientists have a research consensus - a paradigm - Weeds must be controlled. Herbicides are the best control technology. Agriculture's practitoners should discuss the necessity and risks of their technology. Discussion must include scientific evidence and value-laden arguments.
Content:
Front Matter....Pages i-xii
The Need for Historical Perspective....Pages 1-23
Pesticides and Value Questions....Pages 25-30
The Pesticide Paradigm....Pages 31-41
A Question of Faith....Pages 43-63
The Future....Pages 65-70
Back Matter....Pages 71-73
....
Download the book Weed Science - A Plea for Thought - Revisited for free or read online
Continue reading on any device:
Last viewed books
Related books
{related-news}
Comments (0)