Ebook: Galileo’s Logic of Discovery and Proof: The Background, Content, and Use of His Appropriated Treatises on Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics
Author: William A. Wallace (auth.)
- Tags: Philosophy of Science, History, History and Philosophical Foundations of Physics, Astronomy Observations and Techniques, Logic
- Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 137
- Year: 1992
- Publisher: Springer Netherlands
- Edition: 1
- Language: English
- pdf
This volume is presented as a companion study to my translation of Galileo's MS 27, Galileo's Logical Treatises, which contains Galileo's appropriated questions on Aristotle's Posterior Analytics - a work only recently transcribed from the Latin autograph. Its purpose is to acquaint an English-reading audience with the teaching in those treatises. This is basically a sixteenth-century logic of discovery and of proof about which little is known in the present day, yet one that arguably guided the most significant research program of the seventeenth century. Despite its historical and systematic importance, the teaching is difficult to explain to the modern reader. Part of the problem stems from the fragmentary nature of the manuscript in which it is preserved, part from the contents of the teaching itself, which requires a considerable propadeutic for its comprehension. A word of explanation is thus required to set out the structure of the volume and to detail the editorial decisions that underlie its organization. Two major manuscript studies have advanced the cause of scholarship on Galileo within the past two decades. The first relates to Galileo's experimental activity at Padua prior to his discoveries with the telescope that led to the publication of his Sidereus nuncius in 1610. Much of this activity has been uncovered by Stillman Drake in analyses of manuscript fragments associated with the composition of Galileo's Two New Sciences, fragments now bound in a codex identified as MS 72 in the collection of Galileiana at the Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale in Florence.
The problem of Galileo's logical methodology has long interested scholars. In this volume William A. Wallace offers a solution that is completely unexpected, yet backed by convincing documentary evidence. His analysis starts with an early notebook Galileo wrote at Pisa, appropriating a Jesuit professor's exposition of the PosteriorAnalystics of Aristotle, and ends with one of the last letters Galileo wrote, stating that in logic he has been a Peripatetic all his life. Wallace's detective work unearths the complete logic course from which the notebook was excerpted, then proceeds to show how its terminology and methodology continue to surface in Galileo's later writings in which he founds his new sciences of the heavens and of local motion. The result is a tour de force that commends itself not only to Galileo's scholars and to logicians, philosophers, and historians, but to anyone interested in the epistemic roots of modern science.
The problem of Galileo's logical methodology has long interested scholars. In this volume William A. Wallace offers a solution that is completely unexpected, yet backed by convincing documentary evidence. His analysis starts with an early notebook Galileo wrote at Pisa, appropriating a Jesuit professor's exposition of the PosteriorAnalystics of Aristotle, and ends with one of the last letters Galileo wrote, stating that in logic he has been a Peripatetic all his life. Wallace's detective work unearths the complete logic course from which the notebook was excerpted, then proceeds to show how its terminology and methodology continue to surface in Galileo's later writings in which he founds his new sciences of the heavens and of local motion. The result is a tour de force that commends itself not only to Galileo's scholars and to logicians, philosophers, and historians, but to anyone interested in the epistemic roots of modern science.
Content:
Front Matter....Pages i-xxiii
Galileo’s Logical Methodology....Pages 1-29
Front Matter....Pages 31-31
The Understanding of Logic Implicit in MS 27....Pages 33-83
Science and Opinion as Understood in MS 27....Pages 84-133
Demonstration and Its Requirements in MS 27....Pages 134-190
Front Matter....Pages 191-191
Galileo’s Search for a New Science of the Heavens....Pages 193-237
Galileo’s New Sciences of Mechanics and Local Motion....Pages 238-298
Epilogue....Pages 299-303
Back Matter....Pages 304-333
The problem of Galileo's logical methodology has long interested scholars. In this volume William A. Wallace offers a solution that is completely unexpected, yet backed by convincing documentary evidence. His analysis starts with an early notebook Galileo wrote at Pisa, appropriating a Jesuit professor's exposition of the PosteriorAnalystics of Aristotle, and ends with one of the last letters Galileo wrote, stating that in logic he has been a Peripatetic all his life. Wallace's detective work unearths the complete logic course from which the notebook was excerpted, then proceeds to show how its terminology and methodology continue to surface in Galileo's later writings in which he founds his new sciences of the heavens and of local motion. The result is a tour de force that commends itself not only to Galileo's scholars and to logicians, philosophers, and historians, but to anyone interested in the epistemic roots of modern science.
Content:
Front Matter....Pages i-xxiii
Galileo’s Logical Methodology....Pages 1-29
Front Matter....Pages 31-31
The Understanding of Logic Implicit in MS 27....Pages 33-83
Science and Opinion as Understood in MS 27....Pages 84-133
Demonstration and Its Requirements in MS 27....Pages 134-190
Front Matter....Pages 191-191
Galileo’s Search for a New Science of the Heavens....Pages 193-237
Galileo’s New Sciences of Mechanics and Local Motion....Pages 238-298
Epilogue....Pages 299-303
Back Matter....Pages 304-333
....