Ebook: Make and Let Die: Untimely Sovereignties

With this formidable reminder that “we have never been secular”...Kathleen Biddick expands the historical and theoretical horizon of our reflections on sovereignty and the biopolitical, opening anew the “medieval archives of violence.” She does so unexpectedly by way of tears and treason, zombies and machines, the (current) prison and “the panopticon’s two bodies,” surveillance and abandonment, the tree of life and the “excarnated” Jews and Muslims of the warfare (and wafer) state. Who better than Biddick could follow with such dexterous refinement the “medieval traces” inscribed in the margins of Benjamin, Kantorowicz, Agamben, and others? Who better than her could lead us through “dead time” and retrieve “the Christian epistemology of typology” that operates still in the ossified periodizations that govern and rule us? (Gil Anidjar, author of Blood: A Critique of Christianity and Semites: Race, Religion, Literature)

This collection of essays argues that the analysis and critique of biopower, as conventionally defined by Michel Foucault and then widely assumed in much contemporary theory of sovereignty, is a sovereign mode of temporalization caught up in the very time-machine it ostensibly seeks to expose and dismantle.

The essays collected in Biddick’s book argue that Foucault spoke too soon about the supposed “then” of the classical sovereign and the modern “now,” and this became painfully apparent in his analysis of Nazism in his later lectures, "Society Must be Defended." There Foucault groped to articulate an anguishing paradox: How could it be that the Nazis, as the ultimate biopolitical sovereign machine, would insist on an archaic (premodern) mode of sovereignty in their death camps? Here is how he posed the question in that lecture: “How can the power of death, the function of death, be exercised in a political system centered upon biopower?” Foucault left this question hanging.

What Foucault did not ask, and what this collection of essays poses is: how are “to make die” and “to let die” entangled by time, space, matter, and the archival traces of such interactions? Biddick contends that these modes of deathly biopower do not supersede each other as Foucault argued. Biddick claims that there is a living death in the “make die” of the so-called classical sovereign and also in the “make live” of the modern biopolitical sovereign. These living deaths are untimely. Only the refusal among contemporary theorists to read the archives of medieval Christendom’s sovereignty (which constituted itself by naming various enemies, most notably Muslims and Jews) has foreclosed even mention of such entanglements. Biddick artfully decrypts the medieval traces of “make live” in “make die,” and also in “let die.” When these dynamic temporal modes of death inhabiting “to make die” and “to let die” are better understood, the static, ahistorical aspects of contemporary biopolitical discourse fall away. Further, this collection of essays, both individually and collectively, argues that in view of the ever intensifying global mobilization of “to make die” and to “let die,” there is something ob/scene, and in need of more critical attention, in the contemporary theoretical embrace of the messianic (as in the work of Walter Benjamin, Giorgio Agamben, Roberto Esposito, and Jacques Derrida).

TABLE OF CONTENTS: Preface: Diving into the Crypt: 10 Theses on the Historical Materialism of Biddick (by Eileen A. Joy) // Chap. 1: Introduction: Untimely Sovereignties // Chap. 2: Transmedieval Mattering and the Untimeliness of the Real Presence // Chap. 3: Arthur’s Two Bodies and the Bare Life of the Archive // Chap. 4: Dead Neighbor Archives: Jews, Muslims, and the Enemy’s Two Bodies // Chap. 5: Tears of Reign: Big Sovereigns Do Cry // Chap. 6: Undeadness and the Tree of Life: Ecological Thought of Sovereignty // Coda: Doing Dead Time for the Sovereign: Archive, Abandonment, Performance